To the editor:

In Steve Woodcock’s recent letter about funding for charter schools he tries to make it sound like he actually supports charter schools. But you must read closely. He talked with members of the House Fiscal Committee (whose Democrat majority has blocked a $46 million federal grant) and the Speaker but he does not say that he urged them to accept the grant. Instead he wants them to look for other funding for Northeast Woodland School. What about the grant, Steve? What about other charter schools? Where do you stand? With the teachers unions against the grant, right?

(1) comment

jcarter

I am very pro charter schools. That said, I watched the Burroughs-Gilmore debate on Valley Vision and learned a lot about this $46 million grant. It's a start up grant. Accepting it comes with major financial obligations to the tune of $188 million in operating costs. I recommend watching the debate where Anita Burroughs explains the grant in detail and why we need to be sure we're able to cover the ongoing funding before we jump in and accept this money.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.