To the editor:

According to President Donald Trump and the national conservative news media, someone who simply supports a federal government social program that helps people such as Social Security and Medicare is a "crazy socialist."

If we go by that definition, then that would make Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and Richard Nixon "crazy socialists" because they both signed into law/existence new federal government social programs that helped people, and they both supported Social Security.

In fact, Eisenhower wrote a letter to his brother in which he stated that any Republican who wanted to abolish Social Security was "stupid."

It appears that conservative Republicans have become a lot more conservative and "stupid" since around 1980, because we sure do have a lot of them nowadays who do want to abolish Social Security and move our country toward a "survival-of-the-fittest" social Darwinism.

For example, I recently saw President Trump's "Acting Chief of Staff" and "Budget Director" Mick Mulvaney on television. When he was a congressman, he was a favorite of "The Tea Party" and was well-known for stating that Social Security was a "Ponzi scheme," that it was "unconstitutional" and that it should be abolished.

More and more, today's national Republican Party stealthily advocates and stands for a crazy, creeping and cold-hearted "survival-of-the-fittest" social Darwinism where there are no federal government social programs to help the lower and middle classes.

Stewart B. Epstein

Rochester, N.Y.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.