To the editor:

I’m having trouble understanding the controversy about so-called “critical race theory,” to the point where Republicans in the Legislature felt compelled to create a law backed by Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut and signed by Gov. Chris Sununu, banning its existence in our schools.

For reasons I find incomprehensible, they object to having our teachers teach history and related subjects, based on actual facts, not someone’s modified version of the facts.

For too long, textbooks and other classroom materials were limited in type and extent of information provided. Growing up in the mid-20th century, I learned about Thomas Jefferson, but no one ever told us he bought and sold human beings and fathered a whole family of mixed race children. I don’t recall anything about the Trail of Tears, stealing Native American land and exiling them into reservations.

There wasn’t much if any discussion about the number of lynchings, the stories of white residents driving Black residents out of Wilmington, N.C.; Tulsa, Okla, and other communities. We learned a lot about Eisenhower, Patton and the heroism of our soldiers fighting in Europe but nothing about the discrimination in the military and in the administration of the GI Bill that continued until 1948 and beyond.

It wasn’t until the advent of television and national coverage of the Vietnam War, the beatings of civil rights marchers and the killings at Kent State that we could no longer ignore and deny what was happening, and although these events were really a continuation of a long chain of discrimination and misuse of government power, it took many, many years for public school educational materials to catch up and begin, finally, to tell the whole story.

One of the wisest of sayings is, “Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.” Unfortunately, we see this happening all too often today, and the bill passed by the N.H. Legislature is a good example.

Anthony McManus

Dover

Recommended for you

(2) comments

MEPD Ret

There are far too many inaccuracies and misconceptions in your Op/Ed to address in a forum like this.

That being said, CRT is a theory, not a proven law. That in and of itself should be enough to make you question its validity, or at least its intention(s).

It certainly is not the kind of information to be building an entire curriculum around. Especially at the primary school level.

The same goes for "Social Justice" or "Activism".

Trying to instill these (Socialist) concepts without the challenge of an opposing perspective, especially below the 9th grade is nothing short of indoctrination. Even at the High School level, where most young people are still seeking their own identities, this kind of higher-level intellectual navel-gazing should only be taught by a qualified upper-level educator. Not someone with a political agenda.

Public schools across our Country are failing miserably just in teaching the basics. How about concentrating on those first before we raise another generation of incapable, emotionally stunted, intellectual migets, who require remediation in their 1st year of college.

Just a thought...

DavefromConway

Anthony, all those things can be taught without teaching children that all white people are racist or that all whites have bias. And the theory, if you read it, is marxist propaganda designed to divide us. Do some research. Teachers shouldn't be able to teach anything they want. They should stick to the facts. One of the main premises of the CRT is that whites are bad, inherently, without even knowing it. That is not a fact.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.