At the April 7 selectmen's meeting, we learned that a remaining private easement for Rec Path Phase 2 has now been secured through the utility corridor. For those closely involved with the project, that understandably feels like a turning point and suggests that a clearer path forward may now exist.
With Article 46 before voters on April 14, that sense of momentum is important context. It is also a good moment to step back and look at the project through a broader lens, one grounded in long-range planning rather than evaluating projects in isolation.
kAm!92D6 ` @7 E96 #64 !2E9 H2D 56G6=@A65 E9C@F89 2 A2CE?6CD9:A H:E9 E96 DE2E6] %92E 2AAC@249 92D DFAA@CE65 2 DF446DD7F= 2?5 H6==\FD65 724:=:EJ[ 2?5 E96C6 :D 2 D92C65 :?E6C6DE :? 6?DFC:?8 :ED =@?8\E6C> DE23:=:EJ] pD H6 =@@< 29625[ :E C6:?7@C46D E96 :>A@CE2?46 @7 4=62C=J F?56CDE2?5:?8 =2?5 4@?EC@=[ =682= 2FE9@C:EJ[ 2?5 =@?8\E6C> C6DA@?D:3:=:E:6D 367@C6 25G2?4:?8 2?J 7FEFC6 A92D6]k^Am
kAm%9:D :D H96C6 E96 =6?D H:56?D]k^Am
kAmr@?H2J :D :? E96 AC@46DD @7 7@C>2=:K:?8 2 42A:E2= :>AC@G6>6?E A=2??:?8 2AAC@249 E@ 36EE6C 6G2=F2E6 AC@;64ED @7 E9:D D42=6] %9:D 2AAC@249 :D 2=D@ 42==65 7@C :? E96 E@H?’D |2DE6C !=2?] pE :ED 4@C6[ 42A:E2= A=2??:?8 :D 23@FE 5:D4:A=:?6] xE 6?DFC6D E92E AC@;64ED 2C6 4@?D:56C65 2=@?8D:56 @E96C ?665D[ >62DFC65 7@C :>A24E[ 2?5 6G2=F2E65 32D65 @? H9@ E96J D6CG6] xE A=246D :?5:G:5F2= AC@A@D2=D H:E9:? E96 4@?E6IE @7 3C@256C 4@>>F?:EJ AC:@C:E:6D 2?5 =@?8\E6C> @3=:82E:@?D]k^Am
kAm':6H65 E9C@F89 E92E =6?D[ E96 <6J BF6DE:@? 364@>6D DEC2:89E7@CH2C5i (92E 2C6 H6 244@>A=:D9:?8 3J 4@?DECF4E:?8 2 >F=E:\>:==:@? 5@==2C A2G65 A2E9 E9C@F89 E96 H@@5D 7C@> rC2?>@C6 E@ x?E6CG2=6[ 2?5 H9@ 5@6D :E AC:>2C:=J D6CG6nk^Am
kAm%92E BF6DE:@? :D ?@E >62?E E@ 5:>:?:D9 E96 C64C62E:@?2= G2=F6 @7 E96 AC@A@D2=] xE :D >62?E E@ 3C:?8 4=2C:EJ E@ AC:@C:E:6D] %96C6 2C6 2C62D @7 r@?H2J[ A2CE:4F=2C=J :? 2?5 2C@F?5 r@?H2J ':==286 2?5 ?62C3J C6D:56?E:2= ?6:893@C9@@5D[ H96C6 C6D:56?ED C6=J @? H2=<:?8 2?5 3:<:?8 E@ 2446DD ;@3D[ D6CG:46D[ 2?5 52:=J ?665D[ D@>6E:>6D H:E9@FE 2446DD E@ 2 G69:4=6] |2?J @7 E9@D6 EC:AD 4FCC6?E=J @44FC 2=@?8 3FDJ C@25H2JD H:E9 <?@H? D276EJ 4@?46C?D]k^Am
kAmx?G6DE>6?ED E92E >@C6 5:C64E=J D6CG6 E9@D6 C6D:56?ED 4@F=5 255C6DD :>>65:2E6 ?665D DF49 2D A656DEC:2? D276EJ 2?5 52:=J 2446DD[ H9:=6 DE:== 4@>A=6>6?E:?8 3C@256C C64C62E:@?2= 8@2=D] xE :D 2=D@ H@CE9 C64@8?:K:?8 E92E 2 7F==J 4@?E:8F@FD C64C62E:@?2= A2E9 :D ?@E E96 @?=J >@56= 7@C DF446DD] |2?J 4@>>F?:E:6D 3F:=5 ?6EH@C<D :?4C6>6?E2==J[ A=24:?8 D68>6?ED H96C6 E96J AC@G:56 E96 8C62E6DE 36?67:E 7:CDE] r@??64E:G:EJ 42? C6>2:? 2 =@?8\E6C> 8@2= H:E9@FE 36:?8 2 C6BF:C6>6?E 7@C 6G6CJ :?5:G:5F2= :?G6DE>6?E]k^Am
kAm%96 =6?D H:56?D 7FCE96C]k^Am
kAm#646?E 5:D4FDD:@?D 2C@F?5 H2DE6H2E6C 42A24:EJ DF886DE E92E :?7C2DECF4EFC6 D6CG:?8 E96 }@CE9 r@?H2J ':==286 2C62 >2J 7246 4@?DEC2:?ED 2D 255:E:@?2= 4@??64E:@?D 4@>6 @?=:?6]k^Am
kAmp55C6DD:?8 E9@D6 ?665D 4@F=5 :?G@=G6 FA8C256D 2=@?8 E96 #@FE6 `e 4@CC:5@C[ H:E9 A@E6?E:2= :>A=:42E:@?D 7@C |2:? $EC66E 2?5 DFCC@F?5:?8 3FD:?6DD6D]k^Am
kAm#2E96C E92? 2AAC@249:?8 E92E 492==6?86 D6A2C2E6=J[ :E C2:D6D 2 >@C6 :?E68C2E65 BF6DE:@?] w@H 42? :?7C2DECF4EFC6 :?G6DE>6?ED 36 2=:8?65 E@ D@=G6 >F=E:A=6 AC@3=6>D 2E @?46n x7 E96 4@>>F?:EJ :D 2=C625J 4@?7C@?E:?8 =@?8\E6C> ?665D C6=2E65 E@ D6H6C 42A24:EJ 2?5 EC277:4 7=@H[ :E :D C62D@?23=6 E@ 2D< H96E96C AC6G:@FD=J 5:D4FDD65 4@CC:5@CD[ DF49 2D 2 A@E6?E:2= 6IE6?D:@? @7 E96 }@CE9\$@FE9 #@25[ D9@F=5 36 C6G:D:E65 2D A2CE @7 2 4@@C5:?2E65 6G2=F2E:@?]k^Am
kAm%96 A@:?E :D ?@E E@ 25G2?46 2 DA64:7:4 2=:8?>6?E[ 3FE E@ C64@8?:K6 E92E EC2?DA@CE2E:@?[ FE:=:E:6D[ 2?5 A656DEC:2? :?7C2DECF4EFC6 2C6 :?E6C4@??64E65]k^Am
kAm(96? E96D6 6=6>6?ED 2C6 4@?D:56C65 E@86E96C[ @AA@CEF?:E:6D @7E6? 6>6C86 E@ C65F46 :>A24ED[ :>AC@G6 D276EJ[ 2?5 36EE6C D6CG6 C6D:56?ED] %9:D <:?5 @7 4@@C5:?2E:@? 2=D@ 27764ED 9@H AC@;64ED 2C6 7F?565] p=:8?:?8 :?7C2DECF4EFC6 ?665D 42? @A6? 2446DD E@ 2 3C@256C C2?86 @7 DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 D@FC46D[ A2CE:4F=2C=J E9@D6 E:65 E@ EC2?DA@CE2E:@?[ D276EJ[ 2?5 FE:=:EJ 4@@C5:?2E:@?] %92E 2AAC@249 42? C65F46 C6=:2?46 @? =@42= 7F?5:?8 4@>A2C65 E@ AFCDF:?8 AC@;64ED :?56A6?56?E=J]k^Am
kAmxE 2=D@ 3C:?8D 4@>>F?:EJ G2=F6D :?E@ D92CA6C 7@4FD] s64:D:@?D 23@FE :?7C2DECF4EFC6 2C6 2=D@ 564:D:@?D 23@FE A656DEC:2? D276EJ[ E96 AC6D6CG2E:@? @7 ?2EFC2= 492C24E6C[ 2?5 E96 AC@E64E:@? @7 C6D@FC46D DF49 2D 5C:?<:?8 H2E6C] %96D6 2C6 ?@E D6A2C2E6 4@?D:56C2E:@?D] %96J 2C6 A2CE @7 E96 D2>6 D6E @7 49@:46D 23@FE 9@H 2?5 H96C6 E96 E@H? :?G6DED]k^Am
kAm%9:D :D E96 6DD6?46 @7 4@>AC696?D:G6 A=2??:?8] xE :D ?@E 2 D6C:6D @7 F?C6=2E65 AC@;64ED >@G:?8 7@CH2C5 :?56A6?56?E=J[ 3FE 2 4@@C5:?2E65 2AAC@249 E92E 2=:8?D EC2?DA@CE2E:@?[ :?7C2DECF4EFC6[ =2?5 FD6[ 2?5 4@>>F?:EJ ?665D]k^Am
kAmx? E92E 4@?E6IE[ E96 BF6DE:@? :D ?@E D:>A=J H96E96C #64 !2E9 !92D6 a 42? >@G6 7@CH2C5] xE :D H96E96C[ 2D A2CE @7 2 3C@256C DJDE6>[ :E C6AC6D6?ED E96 >@DE 67764E:G6 2?5 :>A24E7F= ?6IE DE6A[ A2CE:4F=2C=J H96? 4@?D:56C:?8 E96 ?665D @7 r@?H2J C6D:56?ED 7:CDE]k^Am
kAm}@?6 @7 E9:D 5:>:?:D96D E96 H@C< E92E 92D 8@?6 :?E@ E96 #64 !2E9 AC@;64E @C E96 G2=F6 E92E !92D6 ` 92D 3C@F89E E@ E96 4@>>F?:EJ] qFE :E 5@6D DF886DE E92E E9:D :D E96 >@>6?E E@ 2D< ?@E ;FDE H92E :D A@DD:3=6[ 3FE H92E :D >@DE AFCA@D67F=]k^Am
kAm%92E :D E96 4@?G6CD2E:@? ?@H :? 7C@?E @7 FD]k^Am
kAm!=62D6 ?@E6 E92E E9:D 4@=F>? C67=64ED >J :?5:G:5F2= A6CDA64E:G6 2D 2 D6=64E>2?[ ?@E 2 7@C>2= A@D:E:@? @7 E96 3@2C5]k^Am
kAmk6>m!6E6C s@?@9@6 :D 2 r@?H2J D6=64E>2? H9@ =:G6D :? z62CD2C86]k^6>mk^Am

(1) comment
Selectman Donohoe is opposed to Phase 2 of the Rec Path. Everything he says in this letter needs to be viewed under that "lens."
No, the Rec Path does not need to be considered part of the Master Plan. His argument suggests perpetual gridlock, where everything must align perfectly before we can move forward. His reasoning is that we shouldn't embark on this extension because, gosh, maybe we could use that money for something better, like a nice bike trail on the side of Route 16.
That isn't what the bike path is for. By trying to broaden the discussion, the Selectman is trying to kill the project. He knows that if the project fails at the upcoming Town Meeting, it will die. So he suggests a delay, trying to confuse voters into thinking that this is moving too quickly with not enough planning.
That simply isn't true. This is an aspirational project which will bring increased economic benefits to our tourist economy while giving residents and visitors a more useful and accessible bike path which will be open for three-quarters of the year, and longer if you count the winter usages.
This is not meant to be a commuter route. Don't let him try to broaden the discussion with the sole motivation to kill the project.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.