There's been quite a hullaballoo from high-level Republicans about widespread mail-in voting fraud, and I'm inclined to agree with their assertions. What rational, intelligent person wouldn't have voted for Donald Trump, this man of magnificent brilliance? Trump has long been alarmed by large-scale absentee voting and its potential for fraudulently skewing the numbers. During his campaign, as the pandemic found more and more people opting to vote by mail, Trump stated on FOX "News" that "ballots (are) being sent to everybody and their dogs, OK? Dogs are getting them." Since dogs had the option to mail their ballots, could they possibly have decided the election? OMG, that's the answer! It was the dogs! How else could Trump have lost?

I've been considering the very stable genius' insight on this issue of dogs voting. It's widely known that dogs are not Trump voters. The president has actually been very insulting to dogs. In addition to multiple others, he called Omarosa "a dog." No wonder dogs are upset! Who wouldn't be offended by being compared to Omarosa? And take it from me, dogs hold grudges. Did FBI Director Christopher Wray investigate the dog voting bloc prior to testifying before Congress that there had been no evidence of “any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election?"

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.