“Hit piece op-eds”? (Michael Knudson, Sun, Aug. 4.) It is certainly easier (though not productive) to resort to name-calling, conspiracy theories and false accusations than to delve deeply into the science and engage in scientific discussion. For the record, I have never been a member of the AMA for the very reasons pointed out by Knudson.
William Marvel’s column and Knudson’s letter last week revealed a lack of understanding of how science works. Marvel and Knudson have confused critical analysis with censorship. None of us is canceling opposing opinion. Science thrives on the critical analysis of opposing opinion based on data that supports the opinion. But opinions based on flawed methodology and/or poor data are appropriately challenged.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism
that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness
accounts, the history behind an article.
(1) comment
Excellent rebuttal. Thank you.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.