Voorheen Dunn: Two recent decisions show Supreme Court is not reliability conservative

kAmyF?6 |65:42= $6CG:46D G #FDD@ H2D 564:565 3J 2 d\c G@E6[ 2?5 96=5 F?4@?DE:EFE:@?2= 2 {@F:D:2?2 =2H C6BF:C:?8 E92E 23@CE:@?:DED 92G6 25>:EE:?8 AC:G:=686D 2E =@42= 9@DA:E2=D] $E2E6D C@FE:?6=J C6BF:C6 25>:EE:?8 AC:G:=686D 7@C 5@4E@CD H9@ A6C7@C> 2 G2C:6EJ @7 DFC8:42= AC@465FC6D[ 3FE E9:D =2H H2D @3G:@FD=J :?E6?565 E@ >2<6 :E 92C56C 7@C H@>6? E@ @3E2:? 23@CE:@?D :? {@F:D:2?2] %96 7@FC =:36C2= ;FDE:46D[ v:?D3FC8[ qC6J6C[ $@E@>2J@C[ 2?5 z282? CF=65 E92E E96 =2H A=2465 2? “F?5F6 3FC56?” @? 23@CE:@? C:89ED] $FCAC:D:?8=J[ r9:67 yFDE:46 #@36CED 42DE E96 7:7E9 2?5 564:5:?8 G@E6]k^Am

kAm%96 $64@?5 p>6?5>6?E >62?H9:=6 92D 364@>6 E9:D r@FCE’D 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= @CA92?] %96 r@FCE 56?:65 2 A6E:E:@? E@ C6G:6H #@86CD G vC6H2= 492==6?8:?8 }6H y6CD6J’D 8F? 4@?EC@= C68F=2E:@? C6BF:C:?8 2? 2AA=:42?E 7@C 2 42CCJ A6C>:E E@ 56>@?DEC2E6 2 “;FDE:7:23=6 ?665” 32D65 @? 2? “FC86?E ?646DD:EJ 7@C D6=7\AC@E64E:@?[ 2D 6G:56?465 3J DA64:7:4 E9C62ED @C AC6G:@FD 2EE24<D” E92E H2D FA96=5 3J 2 7656C2= r@FCE @7 pAA62=D]k^Am

kAm%96 }6H y6CD6J =2H H2D @3G:@FD=J :?E6?565 E@ >2<6 :E 92C56C E@ 6I6C4:D6 E96 C:89E E@ <66A 2?5 362C 2C>D @FED:56 E96 9@>6] yFDE:46 r=62C2?46 %9@>2D 5:DD6?E65 7C@> E96 r@FCE’D C67FD2= E@ 962C E96 2AA62=[ 2?5 2AE=J DF>>2C:K65 E96 r@FCE’D 4@?EC2DE:?8 EC62E>6?E @7 EH@ 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= C:89EDi “xE D66>D 9:89=J F?=:<6=J E92E E96 r@FCE H@F=5 2==@H 2 DE2E6 E@ 6?7@C46 2 =2H C6BF:C:?8 2 H@>2? E@ AC@G:56 2 ;FDE:7:23=6 ?665 367@C6 D66<:?8 2? 23@CE:@?]”k^Am

kAm'@@C966D sF??[ !9sk^Am

kAm|25:D@?k^Am