To the editor:

One wonders whether William Marvel’s main interest lies in addressing specific historical inaccuracies, or simply in spouting his brand of ideological dogma by playing all of the right-wing’s greatest hits in his recent column in defense of his “conservative whipping boy” friend, Tom McLaughlin. His use of the terms “liberal,” “pundit,” “radical doctrine,” “progressive ideology,” “provocative,” and “activist journalism” in his piece betrays his obvious slant.

Tags

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Post a comment
Stop watching this discussion.