James Pietrangelo: Nothing frivolous about protecting property rights

This is classic Peitrangelo. If there is a dispute, take it to the highest court (and laughably lose). Bozo-dom in the highest degree, and an exhibition of ego, Jim always thinks the wrongs done to him deserve the attention of the Supremes.

What were the “personal “ attacks to refer to . I want to know specifics . I’ve read these letters too have not seen anything personal. Just opinions about a public official vies , actions and comments. In a Democratic society we have the right to speak out about public officials and comment on their job performance. I’ve hear a lot of personal attacks from people from mass that’s for sure . Folks have been critical of Tom but no one is going after him personally that I’m aware. I fear this is just another example of snowflakes culture. We can insult you , scream bad foul language at my children on the covered bridge. Tell me what that are saying about Tom that’s personal. I want to know .

As has been said many times, STR opponents are all about opinions, while proponents continue to state the facts. For example: Opinion: “Judge Ignatius arguably was simply wrong.” Fact: The court stated that the town of Conway misinterpreted and misrepresented the zoning ordinance and ruled that STRs are a residential use of a dwelling. Opinion: “To Tom Holmes and the selectmen, I say: You did the right thing.” Fact: Tom Holmes publicly stated we should all let the court decide. The court did so. But he and the selectmen (except for one) did not accept the court’s decision. Opinion: Mr. Pietrangelo states that STR proponents want STRs to be regulated “like hotels and other lodging places.” Fact: STR supporters never said that. We never likened STRs to “hotels and other lodging places”. And neither did the court. You’re thinking of Nick Borelli, Madison’s most vocal STR opponent. He likens STRs to hotels and motels every chance he gets. Opinion: Mr. Pietrangelo claims STRs can’t be regulated in residential zones. He says that is “nonsensical, if not absurd” and “What would be the legal authority?” Fact: The legal authority is the zoning board and the zoning ordinance. (That’s a no-brainer.). Opinion: Mr. Pietrangelo claims STRs turn the definitions of “‘residential’ or ‘residence’ on their head.” Fact: Both those terms have different definitions and meanings. That was part of the reason STR opponents failed in court…because they were trying to claim the meanings are the same. They are not. Look them up. Opinion: Mr. Pietrangelo claims “STRs violate property rights”. Fact: Banning STRs would actually be a violation of private property rights. The Bundle of Rights includes the right of ownership, control, exclusion and disposition. Your right of enjoyment can not be exercised beyond the limits of local noise control laws. Mr. Pietrangelo did get one thing right, or perhaps it was the CDS, with the headline: “Nothing frivolous about protecting property rights“. On that we can agree. I only wish he understood what that means.

I understand your socialist approach. I personally agree with property’s rights for tax paying property owners. I believe in freedom from big government controls, you want government to change the world to your liking . Weekly rentals have been a thing in this areas for generations. You want to change that . Bring the high paying jobs in . I understand you want to convert all the second homes to affordable housing. I understand you want a lot more section 8 . Tom Irving was very clear on this issue when I met with him . I understand the need for more trailer parks and cluster housing. I understand the need to put money into education, substance abuse , subsidies for hosing in Conway . A I appreciate the socialist wanting to help . But taking away someone else’s rights to turn Conway into one big affordable housing projects is not they way . But I can see where this is headed so I will just say good luck w your socialist freedom limiting ways . I really don’t care except it’s a sing of the times I guess . Change property rights laws to fit your needs for peace and quiet. I get it even a nice respectful quiet tourist is annoying to you . I saw you said “good riddance “ to the outsiders. I hope you get the Conway you want . As Tom Irving said to me when I wanted to start a art gallery “good luck with that “ so I will say the same to you James “ good luck with that James “ I personally think Conway is a lost cause . I hope they build factories and industry so they can have the well paying jobs so people can afford 250k- 700k homes . Bring in the industry folks . Power plants , tech companies, cancer care facilities on and on . Change the economy from tourism to industry and you will get the town you so desire.