To the editor:

The Bicycle Coalition of Maine is compelled to respond to the letter from Gregory S. Wallace, who recommended bicycle riders ride against traffic.

This recommendation would have cyclists do numerous things that are unsafe and illegal. By some measures, riding against traffic is the most dangerous thing you can do on a bicycle.

Multiple studies over the years have found that cyclists traveling against traffic are more likely to be in conflicts and crashes than those traveling with traffic. A 2020 study on bicycle risk factors found that operating against traffic put cyclists at about five times higher a risk of a collision than riding with traffic. When drivers pull out of driveways or turn at intersections, they look at the traffic flow, and are simply less likely to see a cyclist riding in the wrong direction.

How fast a car and bike approach each other is another factor in the severity of a crash. When facing each other, a car going 30 mph and a cyclist going 15 mph are approaching each other at 45 mph—a lethal impact speed equivalent to falling off of a seven-story building. Moving in the same direction, the impact would be only 15 mph—a much more survivable speed. Additionally, the faster the approach, the shorter the reaction time for the motorist, so in the event of a head-on collision, there is a higher risk of injury or death for the cyclist.

Riding a bicycle in the same direction as automobile traffic is the law in the U.S. and countries around the world. Consistency and predictability are very important when riding a bike, and motorists don’t readily expect or see wrong-way cyclists.

For these reasons, please ride your bicycle on the right side of the road with the flow of traffic.

Matt Sulem

Portland, Maine

The Bicycle Coalition of Maine

Recommended for you

(2) comments


I always face traffic. Riding the 'legal' way is suicide. This guy Matt is wrong.

Gregory Wallace

All of the usual lame arguments from the Bicycle lobby. Here is a question Matt. Why are the 3 people I pointed out that were struck behind dead or severely injured? They obeyed the law and how did that turn out for them? According to your logic they should be alive and well. What happened Matt? Wide open road,daylight there is no reason according to you that they should be harmed. Hell they should get up and walk. I only sited 3 and there are many more. I understand risk and in this scenario with the threat behind us and no defense it is an unreasonable risk. You want to take a risk? Do it! I swill never take you skydiving with me and push you out of the aircraft against your will. There are no studies that backup your opinion you just wish there was.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.