To the editor:

Like many of you, I have been watching the latest impeachment trial in the Senate. Last week, MSNBC was fully devoted to the trial while FOX was covering Mark Cuban’s declining to play the National Anthem at his basketball games.

I initially thought that Trump’s rioting supporters were just ignorant of the facts of the election, but with FOX and other outlets supplying rationalizations about the election results, like phony claims about biased programming in voting machines and rigged Black voter drives, it became obvious that basic information was slanted to please their viewing audience.

Many ordinary conservatives engage with a diverse source of opinion, not just FOX and the internet. Most TV channels want to tell their viewers what they want to hear and affirm their beliefs, to keep them watching. This technique is amplified by the sources on the internet that feed “likes” to their viewers, which can become a tidal wave of misinformation to the approximately 50 percent of viewers who only get their news from the internet.

The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other sources, including The Conway Daily Sun, have editors that review articles for basic facts and eliminate the more obvious crazed opinions or statements. The internet doesn’t have this filter. Some viewers cannot discern opinion from news (“Morning Joe” and “Hannity” are opinion shows.) This missing gatekeeping function can result in rapid development of fanaticism, as opinion migrates into propaganda.

We need a functioning conservative party to offset the more radical pandering of some liberals. FOX likes to portray AOC as the mouthpiece of the Democratic Party, and the liberals will soon assure listeners that Marjorie Taylor Greene is a typical Republican. Political gridlock is also not a functioning answer to our nation’s problems. Politicians need to vote and answer to the public for that vote, or this year there will be many pols auditioning for a new book: “Profiles in Cowardice.”

Susan Rheault

North Conway

Recommended for you

(3) comments


The author makes the assumption that the 'conservatives' who invaded the capitol get their news only from the internet/Fox. Hmmm. It is an interesting tactic to call those nuts 'conservatives'. Conservative folks tend to be law abiding, religious people and would not participate in any such event. Also, the author states she watched MSNBC to see the impeachment trial. MSNBC is hardly less liberal than Fox tends to be conservative. I watch CBS national news nightly and FOX in the morning. Norah O'donnell is an uber liberal and the news is slanted left. Fox of course is slanted right. I also read many newspapers. The Washington Post is beyond liberal, having printed 3-5 daily opinion pieces against Trump. The WSJ and the Washington Examiner are right leaning, although I find them more centrist, particularly the WSJ.

Scott Shallcross

Trump's recent attack on Mitch McConnell and his wife does not bode well for those in the GOP seeking to move past the last four years of chaos, lies and assaults on our democracy.


Your letter was interesting Susan. It mirrors the liberal medias way they fool the public.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.