Conway Selectmen Kathy Golding 12523

Conway Finance Director Kathy Golding gives selectmen a briefing about the 2023 tax rate and asks how much fund balance should be used to offset it. (DAYMOND STEER PHOTO)

CONWAY — Selectmen on Tuesday decided to cushion property owners from a massive tax increase by using $2 million of fund balance to offset taxes. But taxes still will go up substantially, particularly for mobile home owners.

The new base tax rate will look different from previous rates due to a revaluation conducted by the town’s contracted assessor, Marybeth Walker of Corcoran Consulting Associates of Wolfeboro.

(4) comments

MEPD Ret

This makes absolutely no sense. The commercial development of the Valley keeps expanding, so you shift the tax burden to the residence? What is wrong with you people? Meanwhile, school taxes keep rising and academic scores keep falling.

There is something seriously wrong with how things are being administrated in this Town. Maybe it's time for a State Audit/Investigation or a Class-action Lawsuit.

John Willie

Thats great people !

Keep turning New Hampshire into massachussettes....

Keep falsely inflating home prices by allowing STRs as investments for rich people from massachussettes....

Our kids dont need a place to live, they will just bunllk with us, forever....

Keep letting massachussettes impose their liberalness upon us and turn our state real blue...

Great job folks !

The more blue we go the more its gonna cost us.

Keep adding layers of beaurocracy...

Lets get councils and due away with selectmen...

Before you know it they will be spending our money before we even make it....

Never mind live free or die...

Its gonna be pay your taxes, die, and pay more taxes....

Great job people !

ssmith

Deeper reporting on the recent assessment and the background/need for the tax increase, including any consideration by town leaders of other options to protect residential property owners long term, would be helpful. This tax increase will likely cause more departures of residents who are employed in the thriving year round tourism industry. I think it is accurate to state that a significant portion of town, county, local and precinct bureaucracy, infrastructure and services (and costs) are scaled to serve and respond to matters involving tourists and tourism? Your article states the rate increase "shifts the burden" of these costs from commercial property to residential based on property values. Was that discussed any further? If the tax rate on commercial property serving the tourism industry is not proportionally higher than residential, it should be.

G_Allen

One-time, or non-recurring, revenue should not be used to fund operating expenses. This inevitably leads to permanently higher taxes as the bureaucracy expands. As voters and the Selectmen make local government larger, taxes will need to be permanently raised...or we need to make different spending choices. Using a temporary band-aid to reduce the impact of these spending decisions fools people into thinking that you really can have a "free lunch" for some period of time. Unfortunately, no. Empowering local government to get more and more involved in our lives means sacrificing more and more private resources to pay for the overhead.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.