To the editor:

Michael Knudson, in his letter of Aug. 29 argued that the leading Supreme Court precedent holding mandated vaccinations constitutional, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), is in conflict with the Court’s earlier holding in Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250 (1891), purportedly quoting that Court's ruling as, “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body, and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages.”

(1) comment

Bosenlaw

The name is Theodore "Bosen"

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.