There's a McSweeney's article by Dr. Daveena Tauber making the rounds on the internet. Tauber, a writing educator, proposes a new grading rubric that's appropriate for the President Trump era. Gone are top marks for evidenced-based claims and organized arguments — those get "Loser" grades. Instead, the "Winners" get "Yuge!" marks for inconsistent reasoning, frequent use of sentence fragments and repetition of simplified points without evidence or logic.

It's a funny piece, but the humor fades quickly when you're an educator and you realize how accurate Tauber's take is. After all, how do you emphasize to young people the importance of nuanced, well-supported arguments when they are eschewed by a man about to assume the highest office in the land?