For years in this space we've railed against the school budget.
But the school board's decision to increase the superintendent's salary to $160,000 to attract quality candidates is not only a logical solution to a real problem, but sets a standard of performance and expectations that could trigger a new culture of badly needed reform.
The Conway school system has many excellent teachers, who staff many excellent programs, (both in and out of the classroom), which turn out many excellent students.
It is also plagued by excessive turnover by first, second and third year teachers, absurdly expensive health care, and a level of staffing that is too big for the student population, which has shrunk, and continues to shrink, dramatically.
In support of bumping the current superintendent's salary of $115,000 by $45,000, school board member Mark Hounsell made the analogy to the free-spending Yankees and Red Sox, whose payrolls are among the highest in baseball.
Hounsell's point, "you get what you pay for" is true enough, but the analogy doesn't quite fit.
Sox slugger David Ortiz will make $14.5 million this year — the third most on the team. Not surprisingly, he is arguably its most valuable player.
The schools, though, are hog-tied by the teachers' union that dictates all teachers are basically paid the same rate of pay. This obviously hamstrings administrators from rewarding, and retaining, many of the "David Ortiz" superstars, whom invariably leave for greener pastures.
Not that salary is always or even the primary motivator for teachers, but it is a starting point, and like any business or organization which pays less than its competitors, many of the candidates who apply to Conway schools are ones who have been rejected by other school systems. Conway is often their second, third or fourth choice.
The solution to retaining quality teachers even under the onerous constraint of an inflexible teachers' union is surprisingly simple--pay fewer teachers more money.
If it meant more pay, many teachers and administrators say privately they could, and would, teach more classes and increase their class sizes. In an off-the-record comment, one school official said many tell him they could comfortably "can get it done."
The Yankees-Red Sox analogy is also a bit off because in baseball the teams that spend the most almost always have the most to spend. It's why small market teams like Kansas City, with not much money, eventually lose its best players to bigger markets like Boston and New York.
There's a mistaken notion amplified by some people who support the status quo in our schools that our community is not willing to "invest in education." Nothing is further from the truth, and like small markets which can't afford baseball's superstars, Conway's taxpayers, which have absorbed nearly a 50 percent increase in property taxes in just over a decade, have less financial resources than wealthier communities in the state like Hanover.
The median household income in Conway is $44,000. In Hanover it is $86,000. Conway spends $14,000 per student; Hanover spends $18,000.
Conway taxpayers can not be expected to keep up with wealthier Hanover property owners, no more than the Kansas City Royals can afford to pay David Ortiz $14.5 million a year.
The proposed school budget for next year is roughly $34 million. Of that, $8 million is for health insurance, an amount so obscenely high that the premiums of two of the three plans offered to school employees qualify as excessive defined by Obamacare.
Known as the Cadillac tax, yearly premiums starting in 2018 for single coverage that exceed $10,200 and $27,500 for families will be subject to a 40 percent penalty. Two of the three plans currently offered by the school (ones that can be expected to be much more expensive in four years) would qualify for the Cadillac tax, and the least expensive misses by just a few hundred dollars.
Can one person make a difference? Could the school's top administrator instill a new philosophy that prioritizes higher salaries for teachers pay, and pay for it by intelligently down-sizing the school system and overhauling health insurance?
A best-in-the-state, reform-minded superintendent could. A salary of $160,000 doesn't guarantee we'll get that person, but it gets us in the ballgame.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 02 April 2014 07:28
Last Updated on Thursday, 03 April 2014 05:07
There is an irony so glaring in the special election Tuesday to fill the seat left vacant by Executive Councilor Ray Burton, it convinced us to support Mike Cyrans over Joe Kenney.
Burton, the Republican executive councilor for 30 years who recently died of cancer, was known foremost for his non-partisan approach and legendary constituent service.
In a job that functions best when it is not driven by party affiliations, Kenney, a Republican from Wakefield, not only is not avoiding partisanship but promises to make it a priority.
The five-member executive council — the only one if its kind in the country — approves contracts and nominations, and generally oversees the business of the state.
It is not the place for overt partisanship in our opinion, and Kenney wears his on his sleeve, having said his role will be to act as a check to Gov. Maggie Hassan, and predicts if he is elected all the votes will be 3-2 (three Democrats, two Republicans).
Cryans, who lives in Hanover and is a native of Littleton, has the same tone, temperament and approach as Burton, and although a Democrat, has the support of Burton's family.
In fact, many Republicans are behind Cryans, including former Republican congressman Bill Zeliff, who said in his endorsement that Cryans and Burton are "cut from the same cloth."
Politics is politics and casts a heavy shadow over every election, including this one, which because of the big geographic size of the district is seen as a litmus test for a potential race between Sen. Jeanne Sheehan and Republican Scott Brown.
So to say politics isn't playing a role would be naive, but this election is as close as it gets where party politics doesn't matter.
Last Updated on Thursday, 03 April 2014 05:02
The proposed 2.5 percent cap on money raised by taxes will likely be the most controversial topic at both the town and school deliberative meetings Monday and Wednesday.
A cap on money raised by taxes is more complicated than a spending cap, so it won't be a surprise if discussions at both meetings drift into the weeds, as voters pepper the sponsors with questions.
Here's a primer on how the tax cap works.
It is a bit complicated because the town and school budgets include money raised from taxes (reflected in your tax bill) and money received as revenue from other sources.
The town, for example, gets money for vehicle registrations and other permits. The schools receive money from the state, the feds and from surrounding towns which pay tuition to send their children to Conway schools.
For the schools and the town, budget planning with this tax cap adds a layer of complexity because of the uncertainties of those outside revenues.
So, for instance, if outside revenues go up, the town and schools would have more money to spend than allowed by the tax cap.
Conversely, if revenues fall, the town and schools would not have the ability to make up the shortfall beyond raising taxes 2.5 percent, and budgets would be cut — dramatically.
Although the tax cap if approved wouldn't take effect until next year, this is how it would change the budgets this year.
Of the town's nearly $10 million budget, about $8 million is raised through taxes. If the tax cap were in place this year the town would be allowed no more than an $180,000 increase, which is about $400,000 short of the actual proposed budget.
The school budget is $34 million, of which $13 million is raised by taxes, and it is up $1.4 million. The tax cap would limit that increase to about $400,000, meaning $1 million would have to be cut.
Not surprisingly, elected officials are overwhelmingly against the tax cap as it limits their power to increase the budgets.
School board member Joe Lentini's comment this week summed up the sentiment of both boards when he said officials are "elected to do a job and now this is telling us what to do."
True enough, but beyond elected officials taking the tax cap as a personal affront, they should take seriously property owners so outraged by high taxes they are motivated enough to take matters into their hands.
Although both the town and the schools would likely take hits to their budgets with a tax cap, disaffected voters are mostly unhappy with the schools.
The schools' proposed budget including special articles is up 9 percent this year, meaning taxes on a $200,000 home will go up about $208. Last year the increase was $266.
Voters are frustrated at the school board's inability to come up with a long-term plan to restructure the school system --- which at the least means closing one or two elementary schools, and reforming health care --- to reflect the reality of a steep decline in student enrollment that shows no signs of ebbing.
It's too early to tell whether the tax cap is a good idea, and even if it survives intact from the deliberative meetings it will need a three-fifths majority vote to pass at the ballot box in April.
Objecting to the tax cap, school board member Mark Hounsell said he didn't care "if it's on a gold tablet brought down from Mount Washington, I will not be told what I will or won't do."
We say, neither should voters. And in that spirit we ask those who attend the deliberative sessions not to derail the tax cap and to allow all voters to decide whether it passes or fails at the polls in April.
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 February 2014 04:33
By Mark Guerringue
Visualize late Sunday night Sun editor Bart Bachman sitting at a computer in his home putting the results of the Super Bowl in Monday's "paper."
Paper is in quotes because the Monday edition of the Sun is 100 percent digital. The only way to read it is by smart phone, tablet or computer, from which stories can be seen on the Sun's website or its e-reader, a screen version of the paper that looks like the paper complete with pages that turn.
Like a lot of things, media is transforming at lightning speed, and, after the economy crashed four years ago, the Sun ceased publishing the Monday paper.
Last September, the Sun re-introduced the Monday paper but in digital format only. So far, 7,100 people have signed up to receive it via email, and the list of readers grows by 100 to 200 a week.
The image of Bart sitting at his home computer is startlingly different than from Super Bowl Sunday in 1989, when the very first print edition of the Sun was put together.
This year marks the Sun's 25th anniversary of the founding of the Sun, and to the three of us who watched Joe Montana and the 49ers win that Super Bowl in 1989 while preparing to put the first edition of the Sun "to bed," that era seems both like yesterday and an eon ago.
On that Sunday night, my founding partner Adam Hirshan, pressroom manager Frank Haddy and I waited for the results of the Super Bowl to trickle in from Associated Press on the tiny screen of an Apple Mac Plus.
(In a recent column about that first night, I mistakenly said the three of us were waiting by the Mac Plus for the results to trickle in over a dial-up modem. That was wrong. The Internet was only first conceived in Switzerland in 1989, and opened to the public in 1993. I had forgotten, but the Sun then received the feed from Associated Press from a satellite aimed at a three-meter dish located in back of the Sun's building on Seavey Street.)
So while Bart last night settled into bed after posting the story and uploading the entire Monday paper to the Internet, our work, on Super Bowl Sunday a quarter century ago, had just begun.
The short story of a very long night is, even with Frank's experience as a seasoned pressman in Danbury, Conn., it took us all night to print 3,000 papers using for the first time a very-used printing press. The first usable copy rolled off the press at 7:20 am.
It was a big year for the Sun, obviously, but 1989 was also a huge year on the world stage.
As if conceiving of the Internet wasn't enough for one year, in 1989 the Berlin Wall came down ushering in the post Soviet Union era, and the "Tank Man" stood in Tiananmen Square.
Though it was a break-out year for technology and world politics, it was more of a place-holder year for American pop culture.
Popular music was pretty bad (the number one song was "Every Rose Has Its Thorn" by Poison), while the movies and TV, though solid, were less than ground breaking with Michael Keaton's Batman and The Cosby Show taking the top spots. (A special nod to baby boomers, however, many of whom remember “When Harry Met Sally” as the best rom-com ever.)
And the Super Bowl? In 1989 Dick Enberg and Merlin Olsen broadcast the game from Miami. A commercial cost $650,000, and the halftime show was "Be Bop Bamboozled in 3-D" featuring "Elvis Presto" and hundreds of Florida-area dancers. (Ironically, not one Elvis Presley song was performed.)
Several scenes included computer generated 3-D images. Prior to the game, Coca-Cola (all this trivia comes from Wikipedia) distributed 3-D glasses at retailers for viewers to use. At halftime, Diet Coke aired the first commercial in 3-D.
The game also marked the debut of the USA Today Super Bowl Ad Meter. The first winner was an ad from American Express starring Saturday Night Live stars Dana Carvey and Jon Lovitz.
"How did it get so late so soon?" uttered one of Dr. Seuss' characters. Twenty-five years ago it got really late really soon for the three of us covered in ink but proud as peacocks in the morning sun that we got the first edition out the door.
Sunday night it got a little late for Bart. With cup of tea in hand, he moved from his living room to the computer screen, and got the Monday edition out the door with the push of the "publish" button.
How late will it be for the person who finishes the Sun on Super Bowl Sunday 25 years from now?
Given the incredible changes of the last 25 years, who knows.
The only sure thing is there will be a Super Bowl.
Mark Guerringue is publisher of The Conway Daily Sun
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 February 2014 05:26